Deviation, measured level by level
Most dashboards score topics. This one walks the chain: activities against goals, goals against the vision, and the whole portfolio against the ethical gate. Representative composition, indicative data.
Do the activities produce the outcomes?
Every objective carries an outcome indicator (EPI) and the leading behaviors expected to produce it (BES), linked by an explicit causal hypothesis. Deviation here has three named states: consistent, hypothesis under review, and outcome unexplained.
Does what we pursue trace to the vision?
Purpose is a criterion, never a metric, so this level is a census, not a score. Either the chain from bounded context through objective to the purpose declaration exists and is documented, or the candidate has no business in the core.
What stands at the gate?
The gate is conjunctive: a candidate passes all five invariants or it is not admitted. There is no ethics score and no aggregate distance. What can be measured honestly: the census at the gate, headroom against published limits, and the exceptions on record.
All three levels, one screen
The executive surface composes the cascade. Read-only to operators, rendered from the persisted snapshot, and every tile resolves to evidence.
Evidence feed for cycle 24
Downstream of the cascade, the familiar compliance readout falls out as output, not headline:
Read-only to operators
Nobody edits the surface. The dashboard renders what the pipeline persisted, and nothing else.
Labeled claims
Every chart is marked correlational or causal. Missing data shows as "insufficient data", never as a score.
Evidence underneath
Every green tile resolves to an evidence chain an auditor can retrieve without asking anyone's permission.